His bizarre and childish whims

More on the social significance of the life of Michael Jackson in The Globe and Mail.

I find this piece to be respectful of, and generous to, Michael Jackson while also appropriately criticizing the man, his work, his doctors and the society that surrounds them all. Surely Dalrymple withholds discussion of Jackson's troubling relationship with children purely out of respect for the recently departed.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this entry.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this entry.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.